Wednesday, November 7, 2012
IWK Dialogue Postponed
IWK has called off the dialogue scheduled for this Friday night.
We will keep you updated once a new date is available.
The IWK officer has apologised for the inconvenience.
SRA Committee
Sunday, October 28, 2012
Dialogue with Indah Water Nov 9 7pm at Japan Club
Thursday, October 25, 2012
Monday, October 8, 2012
Saturday, September 1, 2012
Starting again, Sept 1, 2012
This SRA blog has been dormant for almost three years. We are trying to resuscitate it.
We will try to post updates here as much as possible.
Thank you.
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Water Disruption 1am-4am Thursday Dec 10
We have been informed that Syabas will conduct water pressure testing tonight at 1am till 4am. Please store adequate supply for yourselves.
For further information or enquiry, please call the water hotline at 1-800-88-5252.
Thank you.
SRA Committee
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Anonymous comments will not be published
Please be informed that this blog will not entertain anonymous commenters. Please identify yourself if you want to make your views heard.
You may request for a pseudonym be used but we still need to verify the identity of the commenter. In such a case, please provide your contact particulars.
We welcome constructive and genuine feedback.
Thank you.
SRA Committee Blog
Message from SRA President On Yahoo Newsgroup Nov 13
Many people have advised me not to be distracted by the loud and sometimes rude comments on this newsgroup but I cannot "tahan" anymore, so I may be rambling a bit but I want to have my say on all these nonsense that is going on. So please bear with me.
Many of us have expressed our thoughts about the green Seputeh we once knew. Having lived here for 39 years myself, I have very similar views.
But the insinuation that the elected committee of SRA is behind the new development or that it has the sanction of the present committee is uncalled for.
For those of us who would bother to recall, these are not projects that have occurred only after the new committee has taken over. Even if they have, it doesn’t take a lot to understand the long approval process and the gestation period required before they can take off.
These projects, even if they have recently started, got their approval much earlier, long before the current committee stepped in to work when the previous committee voluntarily stepped down in Dec 2008. Why the previous committee had not been able to stop them or even talk about them baffles me, with all their DBKL connections, hard talk and self-proclaimed prowess.
Let me reiterate that new tall high density buildings you see on your way up the hill didn’t come about without the previous SRA committee’s knowing.
Requests for minutes of meetings involving the previous SRA Committee were denied. These meetings cover a variety of matters with the authorities and stands taken by the SRA on development projects, correspondences and details of deliberations of the previous committee. Precious time was lost trying to piece together the puzzle. Even minutes of SRA Committee meetings were not handed to us. How can that be considered confidential?
Now individuals are demanding answers, suggesting collaboration with developers on high density development, discrediting and finding fault in everything the current committee seeks to do, when all that was said in the newsletter was that the SRA may not be able to stop the onslaught (just like the previous committee was not able to stop the tall high density buildings mushrooming around us).
This present committee is doing everything we can to engage with the authorities and the developers, when given any opportunity to do so. The goal is to ensure the social impact to the community, strained traffic, and all our common concerns are formally communicated.
The committee does not wish to be embroiled in open baseless debate in a public forum, which is both divisive and counter productive. That is not to say that people can simply accuse and discredit anyone.
There are those who want more clarification on the security scheme before they sign up. That is perfectly valid and the security sub-committee has repeatedly, and in good faith, dealt with these enquiries as best they can. There would always be some who will opt out or disagree. This is perfectly acceptable, as the scheme is voluntary and each individual is entitled to his/her opinion. But opinion alone does not help fight crime.
The committee, together with those who have signed up must not gripe over this. The silent majority, who are quietly footing the bill and have said little, have done it for sake of neighbourhood solidarity and security.
Maybe my mistake is to have an open and transparent style. The security committee has opened itself to scrutiny before, during and right up to the last-minute of the scheme’s launch. Let us ask long-time residents if the previous SRA Committee had ever opened its books and documents to such a level of scrutiny. Yet, we are still open to inputs even from detractors.
For all of you who have dug deep into your pockets to want to make this work, thank you. My wish is that we continue to improve upon any shortcomings as we go along and with more houses signing up, perhaps we could even address some of your concerns to up the level of service and perhaps more guards.
We are especially touched by those who struggle to make ends meet and yet dug deeper to demonstrate their commitment. I respect you sincerely in living your values, and honouring what you agreed when we did the dipstick. It is for residents like you that we find additional satisfaction in serving.
Yet, there those who have no plans to contribute, demand to verify and scrutinise a lot of documents and sought clarification beyond reasonable means, are provided those but are now doing everything to scuttle the scheme. Perhaps these people have lost the plot and instead of fighting crime, they are hell bent on fighting their neighbours. Remember, I too am a retiree with no active income but I am prepared to fork out what it takes to help enhance security.
The issue of addressing collective views and concerns on high density development in the area will perhaps be put into a formal referendum. We can act in greater unison and with greater effect, if we act rationally and in good faith. Suggesting developer collaboration from hearsay or selective interpretation of a factual statement in the newsletter can turn ugly and will do nothing towards bringing about an otherwise powerful united voice.
There is no need to slander or insinuate collaboration when you cannot cough up the proof. The SRA Committee owes its duty to the majority who have voted for them and they are the reason why many in the committee are plodding on. My suggestion is that those who are disgruntled with the efforts of the current committee to again stand for election and let Seputeh decide.
If I do not reply to your responses, it is because I do not believe prolonging this public debate is being productive. If any SRA member has anything to say to the Committee, they can either drop us a note at our SRA letter box at 2, Jalan Teluk Pulai or via email to SRA@seputeh.org.my or to email addresses listed on the committee blog at http://sracommittee.blogspot.com.
Of course, there will still be those who want to continue to comment, rave and rant because they need an audience and this public newsgroup is giving them this audience. Thankfully, this group is not the majority but they are loud.
We are encouraged there are many others who want to contribute and help defend the sanctuary that we have in Seputeh and these people have quietly given their inputs. We salute those who are willing to contribute as we need all the help we can get.
As someone who is old enough to be a father to most of these detractors, I say it is now time for all Seputeh to stand together and put aside petty differences, emotions and disagreement. The SRA Committee that I lead is prepared to do that and we hope all others will, as well.
Regards,
Robert Quah
SRA President
Thursday, November 12, 2009
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Meet Shift Supervisors Syahrul and Mohd Salih
Saturday, October 31, 2009
016-2131778 SRA Security Hotline Number
We are happy to announce that, with the support of many amongst you, the SRA Security Committee (SSC) has been able to roll out the security scheme tonight.
The hotline for the scheme is also activated immediately. It is 016-2131778. This phone will be held by the shift supervisor and it is supposed to work 24x7 -- that means it should be on all the time.
SRA committee members and volunteers will continue to meet residents and business operators to invite those who have yet to subscriber to do so. We wish to cover all and to embrace all.
If you have queries or doubts or even if you have heard any whispers anywhere, please feel free to email any committee member listed on the left side of this blog.
To subscribers, please extend your co-operation to the personnel installing Force One Security plaques on your front gate.
For now, we are starting off with just a table and umbrella while awaiting the process of getting cabins and boom gates in place. Please bear with this temporary situation.
What is important is that we target to start on Nov 1 and with all your support, we managed to do so.
At this simple roll-out of security patrols and checkpoints, SRA President Robert Quah gave a short speech where he thanked all subscribers for their support and reaffirmed that Brickfields police would continue their daily patrols and the SRA security patrols would augment security.
In fact, Robert addressed the small crowd through the police patrol car's hailer and this shows the close co-operation that SRA has with the police force.
For those who have yet to sign up, we request you do so to help enhance security. You may drop your form with your cheque at the SRA box at 2, Jalan Teluk Pulai (the provision shop) or contact the volunteer whose name is on the cover letter.
Best regards,
SRA Security Committee
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Monday, October 26, 2009
Lorry Caught Dumping



Friday, October 23, 2009
How To Sign Up

What is the Seputeh Security Scheme
SRA SECURITY SCHEME (The Scheme) w.e.f Nov 1, 2009
Objective
The Scheme is a voluntary subscription scheme open to all in Seputeh – members or non-members. We have the full support of Brickfields police who have pledged their continued vigilance.
The appointed security company will liaise closely with the Brickfields police station. Our objective would be met once visitors get the perception that Seputeh is a “secured neighbourhood” and criminals avoid our community – Perception Makes Reality!
How It Works
1. Every street will be patrolled once an hour, 24-hours a day, with three men from 7am-7pm and four men from 7pm-7am
2. Nepali guards will be deployed with local supervisors
3. Patrol routes will be carefully planned and clocking points will be strategically located to ensure all streets are patrolled
4. Two security cabins with boom gates will be set up at:
• Junction of Jln Tmn Seputeh & Jln Bkt Raja (near mosquito trap)
• Jln Tg 12 entrance to Kommuter Station
5. Normal traffic will not be hindered. Boom gates will only be lowered in an emergency
6. Incident escalation process involves lockdown, police called to the scene and a police report lodged. Each lockdown means all vehicles will be stopped and checked with police assistance
7. Scheme will operate under a separate account called SRA Security Fund with separate Hon. Treasurer and independent auditors
8. Each subscriber will get a plaque to be displayed on the gate
9. Emergency call centre numbers including mobile numbers of guard supervisors will be given to all subscribers
Monthly Subscription
Monthly subscriptions – to be collected in advance every 6 months – are:
* RM40 for single-storey terrace houses & townhouses
* RM60 for 2-storey or 3-storey link houses, shops at Jln T.Pulai & Bkt Raja
* RM70 for semi-detached houses
* RM85 for detached houses/bungalows
* RM30 for offices on top of shops at Jln Bkt Raja
This 5-tier rate is most practical after considering:
• Per capita system: Based on number of persons
• Single Tier: One rate for all
• Hybrid: A single-tier plus head-count

